1. Hiring better is the first priority since hiring the right person is the key.
3. Asking a person to change can be intrepreted as "what am I doing wrong?" The suggested method is to emphasize change to results, not as "doing something wrong".
When Work and Lifestyles Collide: How to Avoid Lifestyle Discrimination-Seminar by Weintraub Stock P.C., April 30, 2010
This seminar was valuable in that it reinforced the importance of being consistent in treatment, while avoiding disparate impact on protected classes.
More importantly, it updated me on some of the recent developments in this area so I can review our current practices and update Supervisors on it.
Some highlights of this seminar:
-Federal Court is better, since State Court is more subject to manipulation. However, Federal Court requires filing before the EEOC which provides the plantiff with free discovery
Lifestyle Discrimination Claims include Sexual Orientation, Physical Appearance, Pornography, Body Pieircing, Tatoos
GENERAL RULE: Treat all personnel the same. EXCEPT
-Can’t really do this so have to “accommondate” protected classes.
“Disparate Impact”: Neutral practices may have adverse impact on someone in a “protected class”.
RECOGNIZING HARRASSMENT
-Judged by looking at all the circumstances, not measure in isolation, includes a “reasonable interference” at work
Anyone can harrass anyone (including Vendor to Employee etc.)
TANAGIBLE Employment Action:
-Significant changes in job (hiring, firing, promotion, pay etc.)
***Employer has “vicarious liability” and consequences in tangible employment actions
Employer liable where “should have known” and failed to take action
SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT:
Employer must have firm policies in place to demonstrate not work related.
Non-Verbal (gazing, leering, touching etc.) and “Visual Harrassment” (explicit pictures, improper pictures, “overabundance of pictures reflecting personal choices”.
KEY: Take care of a problem, investigate and take remedial action. Don’t worry about being accused of reducing liability etc., just take care of the problem
“Barnes vs. City of Cincinnati (Transexual case)- “Impact on Workplace” is a factor of defense.
Physical Appearance-body piercing and tattoos:
-Business impact: CAN prohibit tattoos (if consistent) if for business purpose and attempt to accommodate religious reasons
-Avoid dress codes that impact on national origin etc.
-Red Robbin (court case concerning tattoos)
-Cloutier vs. Costco Wholesale “Church of the Body Modification”
RELIGION CLAIM:
Ask questions! (for example, how long member, how old church, exceptions to the faith?)
-THEN, “how can we accommodate” (if can’t can terminate not on beliefs, but on actions or performance)
GROOMING STANDARDS, DRESS CODES
-Allowed to set “reasonable business standards” fitting in accordance with business needs.
-May depend on position
-Watch for ADA
-Physical Appearance: Weight, grooming, physical etc.
Abercrombie & Fitch “Look Policy”
Weight is a huge issue
Pornography: Access through computers
Court case: U.S. vs. Ziegler
Court Case: Doe vs. xyz corp
SMOKING:
Both “smokers” and “non-smokers” (freedom from 2nd hand smoke) may assert rights
-Be consistent
--Failure to maintain a smoke free workplace
CELL PHONE ISSUES:
-Prohibit use and texting on city vehicles etc.
-Use handsfree or pull over policy
NOTE: Can track cell phone records to see if driving and talking
“Health Care Reform” April 28, 2010 (Seminar presented by FordHarrison)
This seminar included aspects of the new “Health Care Reform Act” for employers.
Some information I obtained which I felt was important is:
-Many important decisions are to be made “by the Secretary”, so many decisions aren’t even made yet.
-Implementation will actually be by the Department of Labor, IRS and HHS.
-Provided details of the Law concerning timetables for the new law.
-Learned the a “long term care” plan which will be available to all personnel with a 5 year period before claims can be filed.
-Learned details of the new such as requiring no deductibles/copays for may treatments and for child medical (dental/vision?) care. Age to be established “by the secretary”.
-Learned several details which will be valuable to some city personnel concerning coverage for children etc.
-Learned Medical Reinbursements for over-the-counter medicines is being eliminated and limits reduced to $2,500 (costing employees who have large expenses)
-New taxes to pay for health reform.
The presenters also emphasized that there will be changes before many of the new changes become effective.
Municipal Technical Advisory Service, Wednesday, January 20, 2010. Training Instructor: Melissa Asburn, Legal Consultant
This training was an update in a variety of areas, including the Americans with Disabilities Amendments (2008), Family and Medical Leave Act amendments, Open Records and Open Meeting Law updates and reminders. The update also included information on the Code Enforcement and the Tennessee Clean Energy Act of 2009.
American with Disabilities Amendments (ADA)
-The ADA updates concerned recent amendments which significantly broadened the coverage of the ADA to the point that almost anyone can make a claim under the law. Some of the major changes included:
-Puts burden on employer
-Greatly broaden coverage of what a disability is including "regarded as disabled". Disability expanded to "Substantially limiting one or more major life activities", with "major life activities" including almost anything.
-Defined "substantially" as "compared to most people in the population".
Major discussion included how to comply with the law. Included evaluating Job Descriptions to insure that the "mental and physical requirements of the job" are specified and thoroughly discussed.
-Also, include the question "Are you able to document essential functions of the job" on the application. (Thoroughly note on job description.)
Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
-Reviewed changes in the FMLA and military leave requirements. (FMLA does not apply to Lakeland)
Military Leave
This reviewed changes to the USERRA. Basically reviewed reemployment rights of service members. This was a good review, although at this time no personnel are in the military. This did alert us that in the event of an employee in the military we need to review the law carefully to make sure the City complies with the law. The technicalities are numerous, so this is something to review in the event it comes up.
COBRA (health insurance extension): I did not realize that the employer paid 65% of the Cobra payment (with reimbursement by the federal government) until I took this class. In our case, the 65% is reimbursed.
EEO/Title VI updates etc.
-Retaliation claims can be made by employees who have not actually filed a claim, but merely answered questions in some circumstances
-Legally sound tests, highest ranking persons (and meeting other selection criteria) must be selected for promotion regardless of race
OPEN RECORDS
-New Amendments to Open Records Act. Call "Office of Open Records" with any questions. Changes in charges, requests etc. For example, if requester refuses to fill out form, fill it out for them (can't deny if refuses to fill out).
CODE ENFORCEMENT
-Updated on laws on Code Enforcement. Also reviewed the Ordinance by which the City can file a lien for resolving a Code Enforcement problem (overgrown weeds etc.). Ordinance provided the City needs to pass first.
MODEL CODES
This concerns the Model Building Codes (building, plumbing and electrical etc.) and the procedure for adopting them.